（江蘇專(zhuān)用）2020高考英語(yǔ)二輪復(fù)習(xí) 專(zhuān)題限時(shí)檢測(cè)（三十）任務(wù)型閱讀（五）

《（江蘇專(zhuān)用）2020高考英語(yǔ)二輪復(fù)習(xí) 專(zhuān)題限時(shí)檢測(cè)（三十）任務(wù)型閱讀（五）》由會(huì)員分享，可在線(xiàn)閱讀，更多相關(guān)《（江蘇專(zhuān)用）2020高考英語(yǔ)二輪復(fù)習(xí) 專(zhuān)題限時(shí)檢測(cè)（三十）任務(wù)型閱讀（五）（7頁(yè)珍藏版）》請(qǐng)?jiān)谘b配圖網(wǎng)上搜索。

1、專(zhuān)題限時(shí)檢測(cè)(三十)　任務(wù)型閱讀(五) (限時(shí)24分鐘) A (2019揚(yáng)、泰、南、淮、徐、宿、連三模)How many cabs in New York City? How many tears in a bottle of wine? These arent just the lyrics (歌詞) to a song by the Australian musician Paul Kelly.They are the kind of questions you are likely to be asked during a job interview. In recent yea

2、rs, it has become common for bosses to ask interview questions that are impossible to answer.There is no right answer to these “brainteasers”．Instead, they are supposed to help an interviewer calculate an applicants ability to reason.What matters is how you come to the conclusion, not what conclusio

3、n you arrive at. Brainteasers started out in management consultancy firms.Young graduates hoping to join the company would be asked: “How many phone booths are there in Manhattan？” They werent expected to blurt out (脫口說(shuō)出) a random number — instead, they were expected to show they could solve even t

4、he most stupid problem. As consultants swarmed across other organizations, they bought their inscrutable (難以理解的) questions with them.Now, people applying for a job in a call centre can expect to be asked how a nuclear power plant works. While many bosses have great confidence in how good or effect

5、ive brainteasers are, a research paper published in the journal Applied Psychology found they are useless for spotting the best candidate for the job.What they are great for is to make employers feel like intellectual giants. The studys findings are not surprising.Studies have repeatedly found that

6、 most methods of selecting job candidates are hopelessly flawed (有缺點(diǎn)的)．Job interviews are among the worst way of picking the right person for the job. The results of this research raise the question: if interviews are bad at picking the right person for the job, what are they there for? One feeling

7、 I have is that many job selection processes are thinly disguised (偽裝的) forms of suffering, designed to make applicants feel worthless and boost the confidence of the person asking the question. Think about the extensive list of personal skills required for even the most lowly entrylevel job.Or tho

8、se painful assessment centres where you are supposed to play nice with people you are competing against to get the job.And then there are the firms that ask applicants to make a presentation to convey how awesome the firms are.All these exercises seem designed not to get the best person for the role

9、, but to assure the boss how great they are, and remind you just how lucky you would be to get this boring job. Passage outline Supporting details Introduction to brainteasers They are widely used in job interviews and the answers are (1)________ to interpretation. They focus more on an a

10、pplicants (2)________skills rather than the outcomes. (3)________ and popularity of brainteasers They started out in management consultancy firms and spread to other organizations. Nowadays, a job applicant is often asked questions (4)________ to the job he applies for. Research findings

11、 (5)________ to popular belief of the bosses, brainteasers are actually useless for selecting candidates. They are just meant to show off the (6)________ of the employers. Indepth Analysis Many job selection processes make job applicants have a poor (7)________ of themselves and the employers m

12、ore confident. Some job applicants are asked to show skills, some of which are (8)________ the requirements of a certain occupation. In some assessment centres, job applicants are required to play nice with their (9)________． Some job applicants are supposed to make a presentation to (10)________

13、 the firms. 語(yǔ)篇解讀：本文主要講述了一些公司在招聘新的員工的時(shí)候，所問(wèn)的一些與應(yīng)聘的崗位沒(méi)有太大的關(guān)系的、讓求職者感到鬧心的問(wèn)題。 1．open/subjective/left　根據(jù)第二段第二句“There is no right answer to these ‘brainteasers’．”可知，這些腦筋急轉(zhuǎn)彎的問(wèn)題沒(méi)有正確的答案，所以說(shuō)答案是開(kāi)放的，或者主觀(guān)的。 2．reasoning　根據(jù)第二段第三、四句“Instead, they are supposed to help an interviewer calculate an applicants abilit

14、y to reason.”可知，這些問(wèn)題考查受試者的推理能力。 3．Origin/Beginning/Start　文章第三、四段講了brainteasers的起源和廣泛應(yīng)用。 4．irrelevant/unrelated/unconnected　根據(jù)第四段最后一句“Now, people applying for a job in a call centre can expect to be asked how a nuclear power plant works.”可知，一個(gè)申請(qǐng)呼叫中心工作的人可能會(huì)被問(wèn)道核能源工廠(chǎng)如何工作。也就是被問(wèn)到和職業(yè)不相關(guān)的問(wèn)題。 5．Contrary　第

15、五段講研究發(fā)現(xiàn)這類(lèi)問(wèn)題和老板們的相反，在選拔人才時(shí)并不能起到太大的作用。Contrary to ...“與……相反”。 6．intelligence/wisdom/knowledge/greatness/excellence　根據(jù)第五段最后一句“What they are great for is to make employers feel like intellectual giants.”可知，問(wèn)這些問(wèn)題最大的好處就在于讓雇主感覺(jué)自己像個(gè)智力巨人。所以說(shuō)面試官問(wèn)這些問(wèn)題是為了炫耀自己的智商。 7．a(chǎn)ssessment/evaluation/opinion/image　根據(jù)第七段最后一

16、句“...to make applicants feel worthless ...”可知，這樣的面試旨在讓求職者覺(jué)得自己一文不值，使求職者對(duì)自己的評(píng)價(jià)很差。 8．beyond　根據(jù)最后一段第一句“Think about the extensive list of personal skills required for even the most lowly entrylevel job.”可知，最低級(jí)的入門(mén)級(jí)工作應(yīng)該不需要這么多的個(gè)人技能，可見(jiàn)有些要求已經(jīng)遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)超過(guò)了這個(gè)職位的需要。beyond“超越”。 9．competitors/rivals/opponents　根據(jù)最后一段第二句“

17、Or those painful assessment centres where you are supposed to play nice with people you are competing against to get the job.”可知答案。 10．praise/applaud　根據(jù)最后一段倒數(shù)第二句“And then there are the firms that ask applicants to make a presentation to convey how awesome the firms are.”還有一些公司要求申請(qǐng)者做一個(gè)演講來(lái)表達(dá)公司有多棒。也就是

18、要讓求職者來(lái)表?yè)P(yáng)這家公司。 B (2019蘇、錫、常、鎮(zhèn)三模)Human love isnt neatly ordered or easily predictable.But that doesnt mean that mathematics hasnt got something because, love, as with most of life, is full of patterns.Mathematics is, basically, all about the study of patterns, patterns from predicting the weather to

19、 the fluctuations (起伏) in the stock market, to the movement of the planets or the growth of cities.And if were being honest, none of those things are exactly neatly ordered and easily predictable, either. So let us talk about how to pick a perfect partner using a bit of mathematics that is called O

20、ptimal Stopping Theory. Imagine that you start dating when youre 15 and ideally, youd like to be married by the time that youre 35.And theres a number of people that you could potentially date across your lifetime, and theyll be at varying levels of goodness.The math says then that what you should

21、do in the first 37 percent of your dating window, you should just reject everybody as serious marriage potential.And then, you should pick the next person that is better than everybody that youve seen before.If you do this, it can be mathematically proven, in fact, that this is the best possible way

22、 of maximizing your chances of finding the perfect partner. But unfortunately, I have to tell you that this method does come with some risks. For instance, imagine if your perfect partner appeared during your first 37 percent.Now, unfortunately, youd have to reject them.Now, if youre following the

23、 maths, Im afraid no one else will appear thats better than anyone youve seen before, so you have to go on rejecting everyone and die alone. Okay, another risk is, lets imagine, instead, that the first people that you dated in your first 37 percent are just incredibly dull, boring, terrible people.

24、Now, thats okay, because youre in your rejection phase.But then imagine, the next person to come along is just slightly less boring, dull and terrible than everybody that youve seen before.Now, if you are following the maths, Im afraid you have to marry them and end up in a relationship which is, fr

25、ankly, not most satisfying. Okay, so this method doesnt give you a 100 percent success rate, but theres no other possible strategy that can do any better. And actually, I also think that subconsciously, humans, we do sort of do this anyway.We give ourselves a little bit of time to play the field,

26、get a feel for the marketplace or whatever when were young.And then we only start looking seriously at potential marriage candidates once we hit our midto late20s.I think this is convincing proof, if ever it were needed, that everybodys brains are prewired(天生的) to be just a little bit mathematical.T

27、herefore, it can be mathematically proven that this is the best way to find the perfect partner. Title: The Mathematics of Love Main Points Supporting Details The reason mathematics can help with human love Love is full of unpredictable patterns. Mathematics (1)________ patterns that are n

28、ot neatly ordered. The best (2)________ way to pick a perfect partner Pick (3)________ of the first 37 percent, and then choose the next better person that comes along. (4) ______ Coming with the Optimal Stopping Theory 1.Cause: Your perfect partner is rejected when he/she appears

29、during the first 37 percent. Result: You will die alone as you will reject anyone coming (5) ________. 2．Cause: The next person is slightly (6)________ than any of the first 37 percent, who you have rejected and who are just incredibly terrible. Result: Following the maths, you have to choose him

30、/her， (7)________ in a partner not most satisfying. (8)________ the Optimal Stopping Theory is the best strategy Subconsciously, humans play the field before seriously starting looking for a potential person for (9)________． Human brains are naturally mathematical because we often (10)_____

31、___ some time getting a feel for the marketplace before making serious decisions. 語(yǔ)篇解讀：本文主要介紹了如何利用數(shù)學(xué)概率理論尋找最佳伴侶。 1．studies　根據(jù)第一段的第三句“Mathematics is, basically, all about the study of patterns”可知，數(shù)學(xué)是研究規(guī)律的。study研究。 2．mathematical　根據(jù)第三段最后一句“If you do this, it can be mathematically proven, in fact,

32、that this is the best possible way of maximizing your chances of finding the perfect partner.”可知，如果你這樣做，就可以從數(shù)學(xué)上證明，事實(shí)上，這是最大化你找到完美伴侶的機(jī)會(huì)的最好方法。所以用mathematical “數(shù)學(xué)的”。 3．none　根據(jù)第三段的第三句“...you should just reject everybody as serious marriage potential”中的reject，所以一個(gè)都不用接受，用pick none of。 4．Risks　根據(jù)第四段“ I ha

33、ve to tell you that this method does come with some risks”可知，這個(gè)方法是有風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的。 5．a(chǎn)fter　根據(jù)第五段最后一句“Im afraid no one else will appear thats better than anyone youve seen before, so you have to go on rejecting everyone and die alone.”可知，以后有可能再也不會(huì)出現(xiàn)比之前看到的更好的人，所以你只能孤獨(dú)地死去。anyone coming after 之后出現(xiàn)的任何人。 6．better　

34、根據(jù)第六段第三句 “the next person to come along is just slightly less boring, dull and terrible than everybody that youve seen before.”可知，后面遇到的人只比之前的人好一點(diǎn)點(diǎn)，用slightly better。 7．resulting　根據(jù)第六段最后一句“Now, if you are following the maths, Im afraid you have to marry them and end up in a relationship which is, fra

35、nkly, not most satisfying.”可知，根據(jù)數(shù)學(xué)，你必須選擇他/她，結(jié)果卻是一個(gè)不太令人滿(mǎn)意的伴侶。result in“導(dǎo)致，結(jié)果為”。 8．Why　根據(jù)最后一段最后一句“Therefore, it can be mathematically proven that this is the best way to find the perfect partner.”可知，這一段主要是解釋為什么這個(gè)“Optimal Stopping Theory”是選擇伴侶的最佳策略。 9．marriage　最后一段的第三句“And then we only start looking seriously at potential marriage candidates”中“potential marriage candidates”對(duì)應(yīng)look for potential person for marriage。 10．spend　根據(jù)最后一段的第二句“We give ourselves a little bit of time to play the field”可知，我們應(yīng)該花時(shí)間做某事。spend some time (in) doing sth.“花時(shí)間做某件事”。 7