TR 22.886 V16.2.0 (2018-12) Study on enhancement of 3GPP Support for 5G V2X Services

《TR 22.886 V16.2.0 (2018-12) Study on enhancement of 3GPP Support for 5G V2X Services》由會員分享，可在線閱讀，更多相關(guān)《TR 22.886 V16.2.0 (2018-12) Study on enhancement of 3GPP Support for 5G V2X Services（76頁珍藏版）》請?jiān)谘b配圖網(wǎng)上搜索。

3GPP TR 22.886 V16.2.0 (2018-12) Technical Report 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Study on enhancement of 3GPP Support for 5G V2X Services (Release 16) The present document has been developed within the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP TM) and may be further elaborated for the purposes of 3GPP. The present document has not been subject to any approval process by the 3GPP Organizational Partners and shall not be implemented. This Report is provided for future development work within 3GPP only. The Organizational Partners accept no liability for any use of this Specification. Specifications and Reports for implementation of the 3GPP TM system should be obtained via the 3GPP Organizational Partners Publications Offices. 3GPP TR 22.886 V16.2.0 (2018-12) 76 Release 16 Keywords V2X, eV2X, Vehicular communication 3GPP Postal address 3GPP support office address 650 Route des Lucioles - Sophia Antipolis Valbonne - FRANCE Tel.: +33 4 92 94 42 00 Fax: +33 4 93 65 47 16 Internet http://www.3gpp.org Copyright Notification No part may be reproduced except as authorized by written permission. The copyright and the foregoing restriction extend to reproduction in all media. 2018, 3GPP Organizational Partners (ARIB, ATIS, CCSA, ETSI, TSDSI, TTA, TTC). All rights reserved. UMTS? is a Trade Mark of ETSI registered for the benefit of its members 3GPP? is a Trade Mark of ETSI registered for the benefit of its Members and of the 3GPP Organizational Partners LTE? is a Trade Mark of ETSI registered for the benefit of its Members and of the 3GPP Organizational Partners GSM and the GSM logo are registered and owned by the GSM Association Contents Foreword 8 1 Scope 9 2 References 9 3 Definitions and abbreviations 11 3.1 Definitions 11 3.2 Abbreviations 12 4 Overview 12 5 Use cases 13 5.1 eV2X support for vehicle platooning 13 5.1.1 Description 13 5.1.2 Potential requirements 13 5.2 Information exchange within platoon 14 5.2.1 Description 14 5.2.1.1 General 14 5.2.1.2 Pre-conditions 15 5.2.1.3 Service flows 15 5.2.1.4 Post-conditions 15 5.2.2 Potential requirements 15 5.3 Automotive: sensor and state map sharing 15 5.3.1 Description 15 5.3.1.1 General 15 5.3.1.2 Pre-conditions 16 5.3.1.3 Service flows 16 5.3.1.4 Post-conditions 16 5.3.2 Potential requirements 16 5.4 eV2X support for remote driving 17 5.4.1 Description 17 5.4.2 Potential requirements 17 5.5 Automated cooperative driving for short distance grouping 18 5.5.1 Description 18 5.5.1.1 General 18 5.5.1.2 Pre-conditions 19 5.5.1.3 Service flows 19 5.5.1.4 Post-conditions 20 5.5.2 Potential requirements 20 5.6 Collective perception of environment 20 5.6.1 Description 20 5.6.1.1 General 20 5.6.1.2 Pre-conditions 21 5.6.1.3 Service flows 22 5.6.1.4 Post-conditions 22 5.6.2 Potential requirements 22 5.7 Communication between vehicles of different 3GPP RATs 22 5.7.1 Description 22 5.7.2 Potential requirements 24 5.8 Multi-PLMN environment 24 5.8.1 Description 24 5.8.1.1 General 24 5.8.1.2 Pre-conditions 24 5.8.1.3 Service flows 24 5.8.1.4 Post-conditions 24 5.8.2 Potential requirements 24 5.9 Cooperative collision avoidance (CoCA) of connected automated vehicles 25 5.9.1 Description 25 5.9.1.1 General 25 5.9.1.2 Pre-conditions 25 5.9.1.3 Service flows 25 5.9.1.4 Post-conditions 25 5.9.2 Potential requirements 25 5.10 Information sharing for partial/ conditional automated driving 26 5.10.1 Description 26 5.10.1.1 General 26 5.10.1.2 Pre-conditions 26 5.10.1.3 Service flows 27 5.10.1.4 Post-conditions 27 5.10.2 Potential requirements 27 5.11 Information sharing for high/full automated driving 28 5.11.1 Description 28 5.11.1.1 General 28 5.11.1.2 Pre-conditions 28 5.11.1.3 Service flows 28 5.11.1.4 Post-conditions 29 5.11.2 Potential requirements 29 5.12 Information sharing for partial/ conditional automated platooning 29 5.12.1 Description 29 5.12.1.1 General 29 5.12.1.2 Pre-conditions 30 5.12.1.3 Service flows 30 5.12.1.4 Post-conditions 30 5.12.2 Potential requirements 31 5.13 Information sharing for high/full automated platooning 31 5.13.1 Description 31 5.13.1.1 General 31 5.13.1.2 Pre-conditions 32 5.13.1.3 Service flows 32 5.13.1.4 Post-conditions 32 5.13.2 Potential requirements 32 5.14 Dynamic ride sharing 33 5.14.1 Description 33 5.14.1.1 General 33 5.14.1.2 Pre-conditions 33 5.14.1.3 Service flows 33 5.14.1.4 Post-conditions 34 5.14.2 Potential requirements 34 5.15 Use case on multi-RAT 34 5.15.1 Description 34 5.15.2 Potential requirements 34 5.16 Video data sharing for assisted and improved automated driving (VaD) 34 5.16.1 Description 34 5.16.1.1 General 34 5.16.1.2 Pre-conditions 35 5.16.1.3 Service flows 35 5.16.1.4 Post-conditions 35 5.16.2 Potential requirements 35 5.17 Changing driving-mode 36 5.17.1 Description 36 5.17.1.1 General 36 5.17.1.2 Pre-conditions 36 5.17.1.3 Service flows 37 5.17.1.4 Post-conditions 37 5.17.2 Potential requirements 37 5.18 Tethering via Vehicle 38 5.18.1 Description 38 5.18.1.1 General 38 5.18.1.2 Pre-conditions 38 5.18.1.3 Service flows 38 5.18.1.4 Post-conditions 39 5.18.2 Potential requirements 39 5.19 Use case out of 5G coverage 39 5.19.1 Description 39 5.19.2 Potential requirements 40 5.20 Emergency trajectory alignment 40 5.20.1 Description 40 5.20.1.1 General 40 5.20.1.1 Pre-conditions 40 5.20.1.2 Service flows 40 5.20.1.3 Post-conditions 41 5.20.2 Potential requirements 41 5.21 Teleoperated support (TeSo) 41 5.21.1 Description 41 5.21.1.1 General 41 5.21.1.2 Pre-conditions 41 5.21.1.3 Service flows 42 5.21.1.4 Post-conditions 42 5.21.2 Potential requirements 42 5.22 Intersection safety information provisioning for urban driving 42 5.22.1 Description 42 5.22.1.1 General 42 5.22.1.2 Pre-conditions 43 5.22.1.3 Service flows 43 5.22.1.4 Post-conditions 44 5.22.1.5 Potential impacts or interactions with existing services/features 44 5.22.2 Potential requirements 44 5.23 Cooperative lane change (CLC) of automated vehicles 44 5.23.1 Description 44 5.23.1.1 General 44 5.23.1.2 Pre-conditions 45 5.23.1.3 Service flows 45 5.23.1.4 Post-conditions 45 5.23.2 Potential requirements 45 5.24 Proposal for secure software update for electronic control unit 45 5.24.1 Description 45 5.24.1.1 General 45 5.24.1.1 Pre-conditions 45 5.24.1.2 Service flows 46 5.24.1.3 Post-conditions 46 5.24.2 Potential requirements: 46 5.25 3D video composition for V2X scenario 46 5.25.1 Description 46 5.25.2 Potential requirements 47 5.26 QoS aspect of vehicles platooning 47 5.26.1 General description 47 5.26.2 Adjustment of gaps for platooning 47 5.26.2.1 Description 47 5.26.2.2 Potential requirements 48 5.27 QoS aspects of advanced driving 48 5.27.1 General 48 5.27.2 Assistance to automated driving 49 5.27.2.1 Service flows 49 5.27.2.2 Potential Requirements 49 5.27.3 Authorization to support automated driving 49 5.27.3.1 Service flows 49 5.27.3.2 Potential Requirements 50 5.27.4 Notification of updated information to support automated driving 50 5.27.4.1 Service flows 50 5.27.4.2 Potential Requirements 50 5.27.5 Support for adjustment and big data transport 51 5.27.5.1 Service flows 51 5.27.5.2 Potential Requirements 51 5.27.6 Support of automated driving in multi-PLMN environments 51 5.27.6.1 Service flows 51 5.27.6.2 Potential Requirements 52 5.27.7 Reliable and guaranteed connectivity service 52 5.27.7.1 Service flows 52 5.27.7.2 Potential Requirements 53 5.28 QoS aspect of remote driving 53 5.28.1 Notification of QoS change for remote driving application 53 5.28.1.1 Description 53 5.28.1.2 Pre-conditions 53 5.28.1.3 Service Flows 54 5.28.1.4 Post-conditions 54 5.28.1.5 Potential Requirements 54 5.28.2 Support of remote Driving 54 5.28.2.1 General 54 5.28.2.2 Disengagement of autonomous driving 54 5.28.2.3 Provision of freedom of mobility 55 5.28.2.4 Potential requirements 55 5.29 QoS Aspect for extended sensor 56 5.29.1 Description 56 5.29.1.1 Pre-conditions 56 5.29.1.2 Service Flow 57 5.29.1.3 Post-conditions 57 5.29.2 Potential Requirements 57 5.30 Different QoS estimation for different V2X applications 57 5.30.1 Description 57 5.30.1.1 Pre-conditions 58 5.30.1.2 Service Flow 58 5.30.1.3 Post-conditions 59 5.30.2 Potential Requirements 59 6 Considerations 60 6.1 Considerations on network slicing 60 6.2 Considerations on deployment and mobility 60 6.3 Considerations on relation to requirements of LTE V2X 60 7 Potential requirements 61 7.1 General 61 7.2 Consolidated requirements 61 7.2.1 General requirements 61 7.2.2 Requirements for platooning 62 7.2.3 Requirements for advanced driving 64 7.2.4 Requirements for extended sensors 65 7.2.5 Requirements for remote driving 65 7.2.6 Requirements for vehicle quality of service support 66 8 Conclusion and recommendations 68 Annex A: Mapping of use cases to use case group 69 Annex B: Mapping table between PRs and CPRs 71 Annex C: Other considered use cases 74 C.1 Interoperability with other V2X schemes 74 C.1.1 Description 74 C.1.1.1 General 74 C.1.1.2 Pre-conditions 74 C.1.1.3 Service flows 74 C.1.1.4 Post-conditions 74 Annex D: Change history 75 Foreword This Technical Report has been produced by the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP). The contents of the present document are subject to continuing work within the TSG and may change following formal TSG approval. Should the TSG modify the contents of the present document, it will be re-released by the TSG with an identifying change of release date and an increase in version number as follows: Version x.y.z where: x the first digit: 1 presented to TSG for information; 2 presented to TSG for approval; 3 or greater indicates TSG approved document under change control. y the second digit is incremented for all changes of substance, i.e. technical enhancements, corrections, updates, etc. z the third digit is incremented when editorial only changes have been incorporated in the document. 1 Scope The objective of this document is to identify use cases and potential service requirements to enhance 3GPP support for V2X service in the following areas: - Support for non-safety V2X services (also, referred to as "comfort service") (e.g. connected vehicle, mobile high data rate entertainment, mobile hot-spot/office/home, dynamic digital map update) - Support for safety-related V2X services (e.g. autonomous driving, car platooning, priority handling between safety-related V2X services and other services) - Support for V2X services in multiple 3GPP RATs (e.g. LTE, New RAT (NR)) and networks environment, including aspects such as interoperability with non-3GPP V2X technology (e.g. ITS-G5, DSRC, ITS-Connect) In this document, V2X-related use cases and potential requirements already included in TR 22.891 are considered and new ones are introduced. The identification of use cases and potential requirements covers both evolved LTE RAT and new 3GPP RAT (e.g. NR) and also covers V2X operation using 3GPP RATs where there are non-3GPP V2X technologies (e.g. ITS-G5, DSRC, ITS-Connect) in use. 2 References The following documents contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of the present document. - References are either specific (identified by date of publication, edition number, version number, etc.) or nonspecific. - For a specific reference, subsequent revisions do not apply. - For a non-specific reference, the latest version applies. In the case of a reference to a 3GPP document (including a GSM document), a non-specific reference implicitly refers to the latest version of that document in the same Release as the present document. [1] 3GPPTR21.905: "Vocabulary for 3GPP Specifications". [2] 5G-PPP-White-Paper-on-Automotive-Vertical-Sectors. [3] ETSI TR 103 299 (V0.0.10): "Intelligent Transport System, Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control (CACC)". [4] ADASIS, http://adasis.org [5] ETSI TR 102 863 (V1.1.1): "Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS); Vehicular Communications; Basic Set of Applications; Local Dynamic Map (LDM); Rationale for and guidance on standardization". [6] Draft ETSI EN 302 895 (V1.0.0): "Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS); Vehicular Communications; Basic Set of Applications; Local Dynamic Map (LDM) Concept for Local Dynamic Maps". [7] ISO/TS 18750:2015 Intelligent transport systems -- Cooperative systems -- Definition of a global concept for Local Dynamic Maps. [8] Nan Hu, Hamid Aghajan, Tianshi Gao, Jaime Camhi, Chu Hee Lee and Daniel Rosario "Smart Node: Intelligent Traffic Interpretation", World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, New York, 2008. [9] TNO, "Truck Platooning; driving the future of transportation" TNO Whitepaper, 2015. [10] S. Shladover, "PATH at 20 - History and Major Milestones," Inteligent Transportation Systems, vol. 8, 2007. [11] "Multi channel operation", ETSI ITS Workshop 2016, https://docbox.etsi.org/Workshop/2016/201603_ITS_WORKSHOP/S02_ITS_NEXT_CHALLENGES/MULTI_CHANNEL_OPERATION_spaanderman_paulsconsultancy.pdf [12] Bergenhem C., Shladover S., Coelingh E., Englund C., andTsugawa S., "Overview of platooning systems," in Proceedings of the 19th ITS World Congress, Oct 22-26, Vienna, Austria (2012), 2012. [13] V2V Communication Quality: Measurements in a Cooperative Automotive Platooning Application, Carl Bergenhem Qamcom Research and Technology AB, Erik Coelingh Volvo Car Corp..Rolf Johansson SP Technical Research Inst of Sweden, Ali Tehrani Qamcom Research & Technology, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Carl_Bergenhem/publication/262451443_V2V_Communication_Quality_Measurements_in_a_Cooperative_Automotive_Platooning_Application/links/0f317537c05258c754000000.pdf [14] S. W. Kim et al., "Multivehicle Cooperative Driving Using Cooperative Perception: Design and Experimental Validation," in IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 663-680, April 2015. [15] A. Rauch, F. Klanner and K. Dietmayer, "Analysis of V2X communication parameters for the development of a fusion architecture for cooperative perception systems," Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), 2011 IEEE, Baden-Baden, 2011, pp. 685-690. [16] METIS-II_D1.1_v1.0 Refined scenarios and requirements, consolidated use cases, and qualitative techno-economic feasibility assessment. [17] L. Licciardi, M. P. Galante : "5G CRITICAL COMMUNICATION USE CASES", ETSI 5G: "From Myth to Reality", 2016, http://www.etsi.org/news-events/events/1025-2016-04-5g-from-myth-to-reality [18] Ford: From Autonomy to Snowtonomy: How Ford Fusion Hybrid Autonomous Reasearch Vehicle can Navigate in Winter, http://www.at.ford.com/SiteCollectionImages/2016_NA/March/From%20Autonomy%20to%20Snowtonomy.pdf [19] 5G Infrastructure Public Private Partnership (5G-PPP) (2015): 5G automotive vision, 65 p., https://5g-ppp.eu/, September 2015. [20] NGMN Perspectives on Vertical Industries and Implications for 5G, https://www.ngmn.org/uploads/media/160610_NGMN_Perspectives_on_Vertical_Industries_and_Implications_for_5G_v1_0.pdf [21] ITS Japan, http://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/singi/it2/senmon_bunka/douro/dai2/siryou4_8.pdf [22] NEDOs Energy ITS Project in Japan for Automated Truck Platooning, http://www.nedo.go.jp/content/100541227.pdf [23] NHTSA Human Factors Evaluation of Level 2 and Level 3 Automated Driving Concepts, http://www.nhtsa.gov/DOT/NHTSA/NVS/Crash%20Avoidance/Technical%20Publications/2015/812182_HumanFactorsEval-L2L3-AutomDrivingConcepts.pdf [24] M. Althoff, O. Stursberg, and M. Buss, "Safety assessment of driving behavior in multi-lane traffic for autonomous vehicles," in Proc. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, pp. 893-900, June 2009. [25] 3GPPTS22.185: "Service requirements for V2X services". [26] P. Gomes, F. Vieira and M. Ferreira, "The See-Through System: From implementation to test-drive," Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC), 2012 IEEE, Seoul, 2012, pp. 40-47. [27] J. Choi, N. Gonzlez-Prelcic, R. Daniels, C. R. Bhat, and R. W. Heath, Jr., "Millimeter Wave Vehicular Communication to Support Massive Automotive Sensing," submitted to IEEE Communications Magazine, Jan. 2016. [28] N. Andersen, C2C-Consortium "Towards Accident Free Driving", ETSI Summit "5G from Myth to Reality", 2016. [29] M. Amoozadeh, H. Deng, C.-N. Chuah, H. M. Zhang, and D. Ghosal, "Platoon management with cooperative adaptive cruise control enabled by VANET," ELSEVIER Vehicular Communications, vol. 2. no. 2, pp. 110-123, Apr. 2015. [30] R. Alieiev, A. Kwoczek and T. Hehn, "Automotive requirements for future mobile networks," Microwaves for Intelligent Mobility (ICMIM), 2015 IEEE MTT-S International Conference on, Heidelberg, 2015, pp. 1-4. [31] M. Dring, K. Franke, et al., "Adaptive cooperative manoeuvre planning algorithm for conflict resolution in diverse traffic situations," 2014 International Conference on Connected Vehicles and Expo (ICCVE), Vienna, 2014, pp. 242-249. [32] 3GPPTR22.885: "Study on LTE support for V2X services". [33] DOT HS 811 492B, Vehicle Safety Communications – Applications (VSC-A) Final Report: Appendix Volume 1, System Design and Objective Test, pp C-2-4 and C-2-5. [34] A. Kwoczek (Volkswagen AG), "Automotive Requirements for Future Networks", Information Technology Society (ITG), Communication Technology, May, 2016. [35] Void [36] 5G-PPP Project on "5G Air Interface Below 6 GHz", Deliverable D2.1: "Air interface framework and specification of system level simulations", http://fantastic5g.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/FANTASTIC-5G_D2_1_final_modified.pdf. [37] ETSI TS 102 894-2 V1.2.1, "Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS); Users and applications requirements; Part 2: Applications and facilities layer common data dictionary". [38] SAE International, "AUTOMATED DRIVING LEVELS OF DRIVING AUTOMATION ARE DEFINED IN NEW SAE INTERNATIONAL STANDARD J3016"; US Homeland Security Digital Library, "Self-Driving Cars: Levels of Automation", March 2017 https://www.hsdl.org/?view&did=801463. [39] U.S. Department of Transportation, "Federal Automated Vehicles Policy", Sept. 2016. https://one.nhtsa.gov/nhtsa/av/av-policy.html 3 Definitions and abbreviations 3.1 Definitions For the purposes of the present document, the terms and definitions given in TR21.905[1] and the following apply. A term defined in the present document takes precedence over the definition of the same term, if any, in TR21.905[1]. End-to-end latency: time it takes to transfer a given piece of information from a source to a destination, measured at the application level, from the moment it is transmitted by the source to the moment it is received at the destination. Road Side Unit: A stationary infrastructure entity supporting V2X applications that can exchange messages with other entities supporting V2X applications. NOTE: RSU is a term frequently used in existing ITS specifications, and the reason for introducing the term in the 3GPP specifications is to make the documents easier to read for the ITS industry. RSU is a logical entity that supports V2X application logic using the functionality providedby either a 3GPP network or an UE (referred to as UE-type RSU). 3.2 Abbreviations For the purposes of the present document, the abbreviations given in TR21.905[1] and the following apply. An abbreviation defined in the present document takes precedence over the definition of the same abbreviation, if any, in TR21.905[1]. CACC Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control LoA Level of Automation RSU Road Side Unit V2I Vehicle to Infrastructure V2V Vehicle to Vehicle 4 Overview A basic set of requirements for EPS to support V2X applications have been specified in [25]. These requirements are considered suff